Sensor detection
- Description
- Notable Practices
- Images and Audio
- References
Sensor detection technologies include passive infrared sensors, radar, light detection and ranging (LiDAR), and fiber technologies that can identify the presence of an object in a restricted area and deliver a pre-recorded warning via loudspeaker or send an activation notice to appropriate railroad personnel, a private security service, or a police dispatcher [1][2][3]. These systems can also be tied directly into Positive Train Control (PTC) to stop the train without the need for an intermediate alert. One such system with PTC integration is the ShakeAlert System used by Metrolink that performs fully automated actions if the sensor system detects an earthquake (see Resources tab). Depending on the severity of the event, the system may reduce speeds or stop the train outside of tunnels, bridges, or overpasses.
The use of infrared sensors and an automated sound warning has been found to effectively reduce trespassing at locations with known trespass issues [1]. For a review of different detection systems and sensors used around the country, see Warner et al., 2022 for a more in-depth evaluation [4].
Additional search terms: artificial intelligence, AI, camera, recordings, surveillance, videos
- Different environmental conditions can affect the reliability of sensor detection systems. To be effective, the sensors must be able to accurately detect trespassers under a wide variety of conditions (shadows, headlight glare, and other distortions), and environmental variables (e.g., rain, snow, day, night, and fog) [5]. Consider this when determining the placement of sensors.
- Access to electrical power is required for the most sensor detection systems to work reliably [5]. In areas which lack access to commercial power, solar power and battery systems may be needed and require regular maintenance [1].
- Backup or redundant components, such as an extra sensor, may be helpful for maintaining system operation temporarily if the primary sensory component fails [6].
- Sensor detection systems with auditory warnings that are directly delivered to the trespasser(s) are best suited at locations where trespassers are concentrated in a small area, such as a bridge, tunnel or footpath across railroad tracks [1].
- Consider including a way to disable the warning notice during track maintenance activities by authorized personnel to prevent nuisance activations [6].
- If a sensor activation will alert personnel to respond, develop a procedure to ensure that the response to a trespass event is appropriate and consistent [6].
- Develop an operation and maintenance plan for addressing a range of situations, including positive detection of intruders or obstacles on the tracks, or failure of the warning system [6].
- Sensor detection works best when combined with other prevention measures; some examples include [TRESPASSING SIGNAGE], [SUICIDE PREVENTION SIGNAGE], [RIGHT-OF-WAY FENCING], and [SAFETY PATROLS AND LAW ENFORCEMENT].
Images:
No images available.
Audio:
[1] Kallberg, V.P, & Silla, A. (2017). Prevention of railway trespassing by automatic sound warning—A pilot study. Traffic Injury Prevention, 18:3, 330-335.
Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of a sound warning system on the frequency of trespassing at 2 pilot test sites in Finland.
Methods: The effect of automatic prerecorded sound warning on the prevention of railway trespassing was evaluated based on observations at 2 test sites in Finland. At both sites an illegal footpath crossed the railway, and the average daily number of trespassers before implementation of the measures was about 18 at both sites.
Results: The results showed that trespassing was reduced at these sites by 18 and 44%, respectively. Because of the lack of proper control sites, it is possible that the real effects of the measure are somewhat smaller.
Conclusions: The current study concludes that automatic sound warning may be efficient and cost effective at locations where fencing is not a viable option. However, it is not likely to be a cost-effective panacea for all kinds of sites where trespassing occurs, especially in countries like Finland where trespassing is scattered along the railway network rather than concentrated to a limited number of sites.
[2] Barron, W. and daSilva, M. (2020). Trespasser Detection Systems on Railroad Rights-of-Way. Technical Report No. DOT/FRA/ORD-20/34. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Railroad Administration.
Abstract: The U.S. Department of Transportation’s Volpe Center, under the direction of DOT’s Federal Railroad Administration Office of Research, Development, and Technology, conducted a research study to evaluate the effectiveness of trespass detection technology on rail property linked to and controlled by a local police department. The system was operated for several years, while different communications and sensor technologies were tested for their abilities to overcome shortcomings. Researchers found that wireless broadband service in this area was insufficient in providing uninterrupted high-resolution video from multiple cameras, and while TV white space transceivers had adequate bandwidth, their short transmission range limited their usefulness. Providing live video directly to the local police department resulted in quick response to trespassing events; however, dispatchers were particularly unhappy with false alarms.
[3] Catalano, A., Bruno, F. A., Pisco, M., Cutolo, A., & Cusano, A. (2014). An Intrusion Detection System for the Protection of Railway Assets Using Fiber Bragg Grating Sensors. Sensors, 14(10), 18268–18285.
Abstract: We demonstrate the ability of Fiber Bragg Gratings (FBGs) sensors to protect large areas from unauthorized activities in railway scenarios such as stations or tunnels. We report on the technological strategy adopted to protect a specific depot, representative of a common scenario for security applications in the railway environment. One of the concerns in the protection of a railway area centers on the presence of rail-tracks, which cannot be obstructed with physical barriers. We propose an integrated optical fiber system composed of FBG strain sensors that can detect human intrusion for protection of the perimeter combined with FBG accelerometer sensors for protection of rail-track access. Several trials were carried out in indoor and outdoor environments. The results demonstrate that FBG strain sensors bonded under a ribbed rubber mat enable the detection of intruder break-in via the pressure induced on the mat, whereas the FBG accelerometers installed under the rails enable the detection of intruders walking close to the railroad tracks via the acoustic surface waves generated by footsteps. Based on a single enabling technology, this integrated system represents a valuable intrusion detection system for railway security and could be integrated with other sensing functionalities in the railway field using fiber optic technology.
[4] Warner, J. E., Lee, D., Trueblood, A. B., Cline, J. C., Johnson, N. A., & Christjoy, A. (2022). Strategies for deterring trespassing on rail transit and commuter rail rights-of-way, volume 1: Guidebook. Washington, D.C: The National Academies Press.
Objective: This guidebook is intended to provide information on strategies to deter trespassing on rail transit and commuter rail exclusive and semi-exclusive rights-of-way, including within station areas outside designated pedestrian crossings. In general, trespassing is accessing rail transit and commuter rail restricted areas without permission or proper authorization, intentionally or unintentionally. The guidebook documents the extent of trespassing in the United States; existing decision-making guidance that agencies can utilize; causes, consequences, and risks associated with trespassing; mitigation countermeasures to reduce trespassing risks; and tools that agencies can utilize to identify possible mitigation strategies for a particular trespassing problem or concern.
[5] Bernert, R. A., Hilberg, A. M., Melia, R., Kim, J. P., Shah, N. H., & Abnousi, F. (2020). Artificial Intelligence and Suicide Prevention: A Systematic Review of Machine Learning Investigations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(16).
Abstract: Suicide is a leading cause of death that defies prediction and challenges prevention efforts worldwide. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have emerged as a means of investigating large datasets to enhance risk detection. A systematic review of ML investigations evaluating suicidal behaviors was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, PsychInfo, Web-of-Science, and EMBASE, employing search strings and MeSH terms relevant to suicide and AI. Databases were supplemented by hand-search techniques and Google Scholar. Inclusion criteria: (1) journal article, available in English, (2) original investigation, (3) employment of AI/ML, (4) evaluation of a suicide risk outcome. N = 594 records were identified based on abstract search, and 25 hand-searched reports. N = 461 reports remained after duplicates were removed, n = 316 were excluded after abstract screening. Of n = 149 full-text articles assessed for eligibility, n = 87 were included for quantitative synthesis, grouped according to suicide behavior outcome. Reports varied widely in methodology and outcomes. Results suggest high levels of risk classification accuracy (>90%) and Area Under the Curve (AUC) in the prediction of suicidal behaviors. We report key findings and central limitations in the use of AI/ML frameworks to guide additional research, which hold the potential to impact suicide on broad scale.
[6] DaSilva, M., Barron, W. and Carroll, A. (2012). Railroad Infrastructure Trespassing Detection Systems Research in Pittsford, New York. Technical Report No. DOT/FRA/ORD-06/03-1. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Railroad Administration.
Abstract: The U.S. Department of Transportation’s Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, under the direction of the Federal Railroad Administration, conducted a 3-year demonstration of an automated prototype railroad infrastructure security system on a railroad bridge. Specifically, this commercial-off-the-shelf technology system was installed at a bridge in Pittsford, New York, where trespassing is commonplace and fatalities have occurred. This video-based trespass monitoring and deterrent system had the capability of detecting trespass events when an intrusion on the railroad right-of-way occurred. The interactive system comprised video cameras, motion detectors, infrared illuminators, speakers, and central processing units. Once a trespass event occurred, the in-situ system sent audible and visual signals to the monitoring workstation at the local security company where an attendant validated the alarm by viewing the live images from the scene. The attendant then issued a real-time warning to the trespasser(s) via pole-mounted speakers near the bridge, called the local police, and then the railroad police, if necessary. All alarm images were stored on a wayside computer for evaluation. The system was installed in August 2001 and evaluated over a 3- year period ending in August 2004. This paper describes the results of this research endeavor. Topics addressed include the project location, system technology and operation, system costs, results, potential benefits, and lessons learned. The results indicate this interactive system can serve as a model for railroad infrastructure security system for other railroad ROW or bridges deemed prone to intrusion.
ShakeAlert Earthquake Early Warning System: www.caloes.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/Earthquake-Tsunami-Volcano/Documents/ShakeAlert-Case-Study-Transportation-Metrolink_August-2022_ADA.pdf
Description: Case study describing the use of the ShakeAlert early warning system at Metrolink Railroad.